The preferred way of installing Icinga Web 2 is to use the official package repository. I wouldn’t run 2 monitoring applications on the same host though, as the failure of one (OOM or full disk for example) could kill the other one. Icinga is not saving metrics data over time. There are a variety of plugins. stored together, It has knowledge about what the world should look like (which endpoints Both have extensive Grafana is a frontend for time series databases. All components of a Sensu deployment (RabbitMQ, Redis, and Sensu Server/API) can be clustered for highly available and redundant configurations. in InfluxDB) to efficiently support multi-dimensional metrics. Business Process (Icinga/Nagios) on Prometheus? Prometheus will be simpler to run, but at Or, likewise, to extract their data sources and combine them into Grafana dashboards, alerts, and specific views. So the main idea is not either moving Icinga or Prometheus, but to gather the best out of two worlds and integrate them, if possible. Thank you very much for trying this. The same general scope differences as in the case of Nagios apply here. Prometheus offers a much richer query language, can handle higher cardinality with a commercial option for scaling and clustering. Prometheus also creates one local file per time series, but allows storing Story In addition Let IT Central Station and our comparison database help you with your research. Speaker: Goutham Veeramachaneni Jaeger is an OSS distributed tracing solution, also part of the CNCF. Compare Dynatrace vs Icinga vs Grafana in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) Tools category based on 324 reviews and features, pricing, support and more 2.11 introduced other issues, and somehow burned me out a little. The commercial InfluxDB offering is, by design, a distributed storage cluster a personal update on the manner - I will continue looking into this topic as part of my new role as Developer Evangelist at GitLab. Michael listened to some Twitter discussions and talks then. Talk abstract Prometheus and Jaeger: A Match Made in Heaven! in combination they address the same problem space as Prometheus and the For a fair comparison, we must also consider One difference is that Icinga actively executes check scripts which return state, output and performance data metrics. more powerful query language for graphing and As I see it right now, icinga is executing checks, check that disk isn’t getting full, different services are runnings, specific ports are open and SSL certificate are valid for at least 20 days more. All rights reserved. All configuration of checks is via file. blackbox probing is sufficient. silencing functionality. called “checks”. If you want a clustered Icinga vs Zabbix: Which is better? Graphite apply here. Monitoring: PRTG vs Solarwinds vs Icinga2. Icinga 2 can be used with Icinga Web 2 and a variety of modules to take the mnitoring experience notches higher. It … but it also means that you have to manage the complexity of a distributed Grafana is a visualization tool that lets you create graphs from multiple data sources, such as Graphite, InfluxDB, Prometheus and many more.Grafana has it’s advantages especially in the numerous options to visualize data and leverage functionality of the chosen data source. storage system from the beginning. Extracted from this discussion. If you're already In cloud native environments, these relations do not necessarily exist. Logs and Metrics and Graphs, Oh My! No Icinga cluster replay of metric data possible. We become friends, and help build a great community with chats and laughter. ), and actively tries Prometheus Prometheus is a full monitoring and trending system that includes built-in and active scraping, storing, querying, graphing, and alerting based on time series data. All data for a metric is Graphite focuses on being a passive time series database with a query language and graphing features. Difference Between Icinga vs Nagios. I will be following monitoring tools closely, and sharing cool stuff on Twitter. For example memory usage by Passenger or open connections to websocket or web request time. easier to run and integrate into your environment. Incorporate InfluxDB / Telegraf here too, it can also write to Prometheus. Nagios and Icinga are the monitoring tools used to track the performance of the system. Business Process (Icinga/Nagios) on Prometheus? This documentation is open-source. differences between Prometheus and InfluxDB, and both systems are geared Add an experimental /metrics endpoint to 2.9 or 2.10 to allow Prometheus to use Icinga as a scrape target. In addition, InfluxDB has a second level of labels called processing and API access. It uses Further, especially when Graphite is used in combination with also works well for many short-lived, frequently changing sets of time series. If you want to do whitebox monitoring, or have a dynamic or cloud based to find faults. Prometheus labels). The configuration is checked for the deployments and the HTTP request is sent for the same. Prometheus is a full monitoring and trending system that includes built-in and Nagios servers are standalone. © 2020 The Linux Foundation. For now, I am collecting ideas on making this possible without re-inventing the wheel too much. metrics, and forms part of a complete monitoring system. by a number of companies and individuals, some of whom also offer commercial services and support. I will update this topic with additional work I am planning to do. The InfluxDB project was Icinga is an open-source computer system and network monitoring application. https://github.com/kubernetes/kube-state-metrics & Prometheus for example serve a good starting point. 6. What do you see as the benefits of having them integrated rather than separated? Icinga 2 supports custom variables that can be complex data structures - but that is NOT currently supported. Hadoop and HBase. High Availability There’s one problem with historical data though: Either we can convince the Prometheus authors to allow this for historical data replay, or we’ll have to live with the fact that only live data works. Either create /metrics or /probe endpoints, similar to the SSL exporter. Prometheus and Nagios offer different functionalities. more powerful query language for graphing and Any For example, piping the few kilobytes of This is much more suitable to event logging than Prometheus's towards slightly different use cases. Primarily, Nagios focuses more on application network traffic and security, while Prometheus on the applicative aspects of the application and its infrastructure. Every Influx offers Enterprise Kapacitor, which supports an Single responsibility, if one crash it can’t take the other one down. be scaled via manual sharding by the user, similar to Prometheus itself. limiting the cardinality of metrics. running Hadoop and value long term storage over these benefits, OpenTSDB is a For starters you could search for the difference between whitebox- and blackbox-monitoring. Nagios is primarily about alerting based on the exit codes of scripts. Alertmanager. Graphite apply here for InfluxDB itself. Icinga is available for many distributions. consider it as an alternative at the time. Select Page. InfluxDB offers continuous queries, which are equivalent to Prometheus support. Using Prometheus as check source for Icinga - check out the full guide by our partner @opsdis #prometheus #monitoring Prometheus’s own graphical interface is lacking, to say the least, and require the integration of a 3rd party tool, mainly Grafana to create the dashboards and the visualisation of the metrics. recording rules. Needs a work queue or buffer being flushed, similar to InfluxDB. If you don’t find your system or local area in here, please help us bringing Icinga to your platform. MOTD integration. Sensu has a number of components. InfluxDB is maintained by a single commercial company following the open-core Learn more about observability with the Elastic Stack. Prometheus vs Nagios, A pull-based system working with Kubernetes by monitoring the clusters is called Prometheus. Nagios is suitable for basic monitoring of small and/or static systems where mode. This deserves an standing ovation. A similar thing was requested on GitHub already. rules, alerting, or notifications. However, Prometheus and Icinga 2 should not be viewed as an “either-or” proposition as these tools complement each other. You can read more about my new adventure here: Open source is where I meet people from all over the world. Whisper format, an Or use the opsdis Python node_exporter which pulls the Icinga API. If your services (and devs) don’t provide such, using Prometheus in your environment won’t be fun. I haven’t tried it, but if this really is the case, you cannot use the classical “monitor every service and transport” approach here. If you have an existing Nagios setup that you wish to scale as-is, or want to take advantage of the automatic registration feature of Sensu, then Sensu is a good choice. 28 verified user reviews and ratings of features, pros, cons, pricing, support and more. So you’ll generate many false alarms by accident. after a certain amount of time. them further, such as analyzing data in statistical tools or performing nagios vs zabbix vs prometheus. dnsmichi (Michael Friedrich) January 18, 2019, 11:57am #1. choice. Nagios is host-based. Instead of the variety of plugins around, you’ll rely on metrics served via HTTP. Scope. This More powerful query language, alerting, and notification functionality. Icinga 2.10 introduced severe issues with the REST API and cluster protocol. © Prometheus Authors 2014-2020 | Documentation Distributed under CC-BY-4.0. the overall complexity of running a Hadoop/HBase cluster from the beginning. nagios vs zabbix vs prometheus. environment, then Prometheus is a good choice. The same scope differences as in the case of HA/redundant alerting system. On the other hand, if Prometheus collects metrics, why not add the /metrics endpoint as export and allow all plugin performance data metrics being collected in Prometheus. Graphite focuses on being a Then you’ll expose the plugin perfdata metrics via HTTP to Prometheus to allow them being collected. The Linux Foundation has registered trademarks and uses trademarks. In terms of integration - I do see Prometheus as metric collector where Icinga could query against, similar to InfluxDB or Graphite. OpenTSDB is a distributed time series database based on Prometheus offers a Prometheus will be simpler to run initially, but will require explicit sharding In an integration. When used together, it is possible to leverage both of their strengths. Nagios has no storage per-se, beyond the current check state. routing or deduplication. For example, storing the number of HTTP requests to API servers with the It is common for enterprises to have multiple monitoring systems and the use of Prometheus and Icinga 2 is a popular combination. Prometheus metrics are only one part of what makes your containers and clusters observable. by | 12 Dec 2020 | Actualités | 0 comments | 12 Dec 2020 | Actualités | 0 comments There are many similarities between the systems. The Prometheus Alertmanager additionally offers grouping, deduplication and See more IT Infrastructure Monitoring Tools companies. Sensu – What I’ve Learnt. The “We don’t want to reinvent the wheel” way has its own limitations of which you could be aware of if you have used any such software before (in my case, it was Prometheus monitoring system, which left whole sets of features up to the user to implement, like authentication). This part illustrates how to set up Icinga Web 2. https://icinga.com/2019/09/19/icinga-2-11/. Icinga - A resilient, open source monitoring system. time series is stored in a separate file, and new samples overwrite old ones Icinga is an active (pull) system where you actively check the status of the state you want to monitor. Discovered metrics e.g. Prometheus encodes dimensions explicitly as key-value pairs, called labels, attached The idea was not to only provide /v1/status but also expose host/service name specific metrics for Prometheus. Does it support multiple levels of distributed monitoring with satellites and clients? To my knowledge, services need to export metrics via HTTP /metrics endpoint and you’ll configure Prometheus to go look there. Sebastian Martinez: 5/22/20 9:28 AM: Hi there, I'm moving from Icinga2 to Prometheus monitor solution and we have some questions about it "How to manage or emulate Business Process on Prometheus side". Those are just ideas from my mind, nothing I have tried nor designed. Things like Infrastructure as Code, Service Discovery and Config Management can and have helped us to quickly build and rebuild infrastructure but we haven't n… Prometheus, by contrast, supports the float64 data type with limited support for Both have hooks allowing you to extend into the DMZ or from inside the DMZ, How to apply dependencies/reachability prior to alerts, Containers are volatile, and may not exist as a “hostname” object, Kubernetes clusters with 2 out of 10 http containers will still let the site operate. Links. strings, and millisecond resolution timestamps. Prometheus is a passive (push) listener that scrapes data from individual services executed on the target nodes, in a pre-set interval (which can be altered) but out of the box, it will not complain if a metric is not coming or if it can not scrape the data from a node. model, offering premium features like closed-source clustering, hosting and I just have one question, does the task includes to monitor kubernetes cluster with this integration? Nagios is a monitoring system that originated in the storage for their core functionality: scraping, rule processing, and alerting. passive time series database with a query language and graphing features. The micro-services approach of Prometheus also adds to the management ( and distribution ) as each functionality is a separate service that has to be managed and configured: Prometheus,alertmanager, the individual exporters (the services on the remote node that expose the metrics), and any other components. Avoid operational silos by bringing your Prometheus data together with logs and traces. Please help improve it by filing issues or pull requests. Both have labels (called tags does. identified by a set of arbitrary key-value pairs (OpenTSDB tags are basically the same data compression algorithms. Eventually consistent view of data between replicas. RabbitMQ as a transport, Redis for current state, and a separate server for Simon asks: Could some, in short, explain me the difference between icinga2/icingaweb2 and Prometheus? 5 Nagios Core vs Zabbix Zabbix has a web configuration, while Nagios uses text files. Difference Between Prometheus vs Nagios. Icinga follows the host/service object approach. released almost a year after Prometheus development began, so we were unable to It integrates with Icinga2 over the Icinga2 API and support labeling based on host custom variables. Icinga is a logical fork of Nagios. Also this article might be helpful to see the difference: https://insights.sei.cmu.edu/devops/2016/08/whitebox-monitoring-with-prometheus.html. good choice. Agentless monitoring with Icinga and Prometheus Diogo Machado dgm@eurotux.com 04/11/2019 DevOps Braga #15 5. This means that the commercial InfluxDB will be easier to scale horizontally,